At Issue Index
Trinity
Index   Table of
Contents   Previous
Next

The Arian or Anti-Trinitarian
Views Presented in Seventh-day Adventist Literature and the Ellen G.
White Answer

by Erwin Roy
Gane

C H A P T E R   XII

A QUESTIONABLE CONCLUSION

Some short time ago, certain updated, unsigned, mimeographed
documents were circulated by the Seventh-day Adventist leadership in
answer to some of the positions taken by M. L. Andreasen. Document 1
entitled, "Uriah Smith�s Restricted View of the Atonement," states,
"both Smith and Waggoner were in the minority group of Arians, or
anti-Trinitarians, as regards the Godhead, following the crisis of
1844."1
Document II, entitled, "J. H. Waggoner�s Position on the Atonement"
states:

However, it is essential to note, first, that our founding
fathers came out of diversified denominational backgrounds. Many
were Trinitarians, while a few came from the "Christian
Connection," which was militantly Arian, or anti-Trinitarian. But
some of these few rose to positions of prominence among us. Smith
and Waggoner both held Arian views. Both were writers and editors,
and interwove Arian views into their writings.2

In the light of the evidence presented in this paper, it might
justifiably be asked, where is the proof that in the early history
of the Seventh-day Adventists "many were Trinitarians," or that the
anti-Trinitarians were a minority?  Almost every utterance on
the subject published in Adventist literature prior to 1898 was
Arian or anti-Trinitarian. The Spear article was a notable
exception, but it was a reprint of an article written by a
non-Adventist writer, and it contained the doctrine of the
subordination of the Son to the Father, which was quite acceptable
to the Adventist anti-Trinitarian, but quite unacceptable to the
later believer who concurred with the 1931 statement of belief.

As has been shown, there was prior to 1898 considerable diversity
of belief on the subject of the nature of God. Bordeau in 1890
regretted this. But the present writer has been unable to discover
any evidence that "many were Trinitarians" before 1898, nor has
there been found any Trinitarian declaration written, prior to that
date, by an Adventist writer, other than Ellen G. White.

The statement quoted from the document, "J. H. Waggoner�s
position on the atonement," strongly suggests that it was the few
who came from the "Christian Connection," and who rose to
"prominence among us," who are regarded as responsible for the
dissemination of Arian, or anti-Trinitarian views among
Adventists,3
Smith and Waggoner are then cited as holding Arian views. But no
evidence is given that these men came from the "Christian
Connection," as the statement would suggest. As has been shown,
James White and Joseph Bates came from this organization, but it is
not known who else. And is it to be believed that all the Adventist
writers examined in this thesis, who presented Arian opinions, came
from the Christian Connection? Of course that was not so. The truth
is as stated by the document quoted above, that "our founding
fathers came out of diversified denominational backgrounds."4
This fact, and the fact that so many were Arians, is sufficient to
prove that the origin of a few from the "Christian Connection" is
not adequate explanation of the anti-Trinitarianism consistently
appearing in Adventist literature.

Of course the writers and editors of any church
organization will be a minority group. So they were in the
Seventh-day Adventist Church. But this minority group happened to
present, almost without exception, anti-Trinitarian statements in
articles and books. This certainly does not look like evidence that
"many were Trinitarians." If Trinitarians were so numerous it is
strange indeed that some of them did not put their views in writing.
Some would perhaps blame Uriah Smith for preventing this. Then why
did not Trinitarian articles appear in the years when James White
was editor of the Review and Herald? And what evidence is
there that Uriah Smith exercised such an over-riding influence that
for decades he succeeded in excluding from publication, in any form,
the Trinitarian beliefs of the majority of
Adventists?

ENDNOTES

1"Uriah Smith�s Restricted View Of The Atonement"
(Paper supplied by L. E. Froom, General Conference of Seventh-day
Adventists, [n.p., n.d.]), p.1. (Mimeographed).

2"J. H.
Waggoner�s Position On The Atonement" (Paper supplied by L. E.
Froom, General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, [n.p., n.d.]),
p.1. (Mimeographed).

3Ibid.

4Ibid.

At Issue Index
Trinity
Index   Table of
Contents   Previous
Next